Exploring Subjectivity: A Critique Of Reflexivity In Qualitative Research

Authors

  • Dr. Emily White Center for Social Sciences, University of Chicago Author
  • Professor Michael Davis School of Psychology, Yale University Author

Keywords:

Research Methodology, Power Dynamics, Bias, Reflexivity, Subjectivity

Abstract

Reflexivity has become a cornerstone in qualitative research, often heralded as a means to enhance rigor and transparency. This paper critically examines the role of reflexivity in qualitative research, particularly focusing on its implications for subjectivity. While reflexivity is intended to acknowledge and navigate the researcher's subjective influence on the research process, its implementation is not without challenges. This article explores the limitations and complexities of reflexivity, questioning its assumptions and potential to truly mitigate subjectivity. Drawing on theoretical insights and empirical examples, it argues that reflexivity, rather than neutralizing subjectivity, can inadvertently reinforce power dynamics and mask inherent biases. Furthermore, the paper discusses alternative approaches to addressing subjectivity in qualitative research beyond reflexivity alone. By engaging in a critical dialogue, this article seeks to deepen our understanding of subjectivity and its implications for qualitative inquiry.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31